2

The OP has deleted the text from the body of this question and replaced it with "Apologies, deleted for privacy".

What should we do about this? Obvious choises to me are:

Revert the edit

The OP is obviously not aware that previous versions are still visible in the edit history. The edit is essentially vandalism. (A mod might have to lock the post in some way to prevent the OP repeating the edit.)

Delete the post

That would ensure that the previous version is only visible to 10k users (and not, in particular, to Google's spider).

| |
  • I suggest flag for moderator attention and revert if nothing seems to personal (as you mention the edit only hides the info a little) – StrongBad Sep 20 '18 at 2:49
  • @StrongBad You're a moderator. You ought to know better than to post an answer in the comment box! – Martin Bonner supports Monica Sep 20 '18 at 5:31
  • I do. I wanted to respond quickly and didn't have time to write a full answer. – StrongBad Sep 20 '18 at 12:29
3

An alternative is disassociating the post from the poster, which can be requested by them as described here: Could we have a Help Center page on disassociating posts?

As a moderator I can (and did) also ask for this from the CM team on behalf of the poster, which was done recently

| |
2

In these cases it is important to flag the question to let a moderator know what is happening. Often a user will revert edits, deface other content of theirs or even content of third parties. If the community goes around fixing these things, a mod might never know about the bad behavior. So in summary, definitely flag the post. We can lock it, help the user disassociate the post, redacted the problematic content, and give the user a time out.

As for rolling the edits back, this is a personal call. If it seems like the user is trying to hide something (e.g., they posted some PII), I would leave the edit. While the PII would still be in the revision history and need to be dealt with, at least it is a little hidden. If it seems like everything was fine in the original version I would revert the edi, leave a comment, and flag the content.

| |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .